at:introduction
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
at:introduction [2007/06/19 16:49] – tvcutsem | at:introduction [2008/07/15 12:19] (current) – * tvcutsem | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* **dynamically typed**, which is **not** the same as being untyped: AmbientTalk //values// are typed, but // | * **dynamically typed**, which is **not** the same as being untyped: AmbientTalk //values// are typed, but // | ||
* object-oriented, | * object-oriented, | ||
- | * flexible: like Smalltalk, Self and Ruby, AmbientTalk embraces the use of elegant and expressive **block closures** to achieve a level of reusability far exceeding that of Java or similar languages lacking true closures. | + | * flexible: like Scheme, |
* event-driven: | * event-driven: | ||
- | * distributed: | + | * distributed: |
* **symbiotic**: | * **symbiotic**: | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
Of course, we are not claiming that AmbientTalk is a good replacement for distributed computing standards such as CORBA or Jini, which are much more flexible, at the cost of increased complexity. AmbientTalk is simply a lightweight alternative for doing experimental research. | Of course, we are not claiming that AmbientTalk is a good replacement for distributed computing standards such as CORBA or Jini, which are much more flexible, at the cost of increased complexity. AmbientTalk is simply a lightweight alternative for doing experimental research. | ||
- | So, you read the introduction and are interested in all of the gory details of the language? In that case, you can go ahead and [[at: | + | ===== Moving on ===== |
+ | |||
+ | So, you read the introduction and are interested in all of the gory details of the language? In that case, you can go ahead and [[at: |
at/introduction.1182264561.txt.gz · Last modified: 2007/10/11 15:17 (external edit)