at:introduction
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| at:introduction [2007/10/11 15:17] – * tvcutsem | at:introduction [2008/07/15 12:19] (current) – * tvcutsem | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| * **dynamically typed**, which is **not** the same as being untyped: AmbientTalk //values// are typed, but // | * **dynamically typed**, which is **not** the same as being untyped: AmbientTalk //values// are typed, but // | ||
| * object-oriented, | * object-oriented, | ||
| - | * flexible: like Smalltalk, Self and Ruby, AmbientTalk embraces the use of elegant and expressive **block closures** to achieve a level of reusability far exceeding that of Java or similar languages lacking true closures. | + | * flexible: like Scheme, |
| * event-driven: | * event-driven: | ||
| * distributed: | * distributed: | ||
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| Of course, we are not claiming that AmbientTalk is a good replacement for distributed computing standards such as CORBA or Jini, which are much more flexible, at the cost of increased complexity. AmbientTalk is simply a lightweight alternative for doing experimental research. | Of course, we are not claiming that AmbientTalk is a good replacement for distributed computing standards such as CORBA or Jini, which are much more flexible, at the cost of increased complexity. AmbientTalk is simply a lightweight alternative for doing experimental research. | ||
| - | So, you read the introduction and are interested in all of the gory details of the language? In that case, you can go ahead and [[at: | + | ===== Moving on ===== |
| + | |||
| + | So, you read the introduction and are interested in all of the gory details of the language? In that case, you can go ahead and [[at: | ||
at/introduction.1192108636.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
