Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- at:tutorial:metaprogramming [2007/04/19 20:57] – stimberm
+++ at:tutorial:metaprogramming [2009/11/21 07:44] (current) – tvcutsem
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<note>This tutorial is under heavy construction!</note>
 ===== Metaprogramming =====
-==== AT Zero - AmbientTalk without syntactic sugar ====
+==== AmbientTalk without syntactic sugar ====
 In AmbientTalk, everything is an object, also native values such as numbers, booleans, strings and tables. Hence, the only way to interact with these values is by sending messages to them. However, there are some constructs in AmbientTalk that do not seem to send a message at all. Examples are table access/assignment, control structures and arithmic operations:
@@ Line 14: / Line 12: @@
 >>7
 </code>
-However, these constructs are all **syntactic sugar**. Behind the scenes, they all perform message sends. The following code shows the equivalents of the previous code, but with the actual message sends:
+However, these constructs are all **syntactic sugar** that enable a more natural syntax for performing these operations. Behind the scenes, they all perform message sends. The following code shows the equivalents of the previous code, but with the actual message sends:
 <code>
 >[5, 6, 7].at(2)
@@ Line 23: / Line 21: @@
 >>7
 </code>
+In the first example above the message //at// is sent to the table **[5,6,7]**.  The second example sends the keyword message //ifTrue:ifFalse:// to the boolean value returned after evaluating the expression **(1 == 2)**. Notice the usage of the curly braces.  These wrap the expressions in a literal closure object.  A literal closure is just an object with a special //apply// method that will execute the body of the literal closure.  The usage of these closures ensures lazy evaluation of the actual arguments of //ifTrue:ifFalse:// similar to the use of blocks in Smalltalk or Self.  Finally, in the third example, mathematical expressions are converted to method invocations on numbers.
 ==== Quasiquoting and splicing ====
+Quasiquoting and splicing are an advanced and powerful metaprogramming techniques that control the evaluation process and allow one to manipulate the evaluation process of the abstract syntax tree.
-=== Qouting ===
+=== Quoting ===
 Any valid AmbientTalk expression can be quoted. This prevents the expression from being evaluated. Instead, it is returned literally.
@@ Line 59: / Line 60: @@
 </code>
-Note that in ''`foo.text'', the quoted expression is ''foo'' and //not// ''foo.text''. The selection is performed on the result of the quotation, in this case a symbol.
+Note that in ''`foo.text'', the quoted expression is ''foo'' and //not// ''foo.text''. The selection of the field //text// is performed on the result of the quotation, in this case a symbol.
 == Expressions ==
-To quote a complete expression, it has to be wrapped in parantheses:
+To quote a complete expression, it has to be wrapped in parentheses:
 <code>
@@ Line 78: / Line 79: @@
 == Statements ==
-Statements (definitions, assignments, ...) can also be quoted, but only inside a quoted statement list. Trying to quote a statement in the same way as an expression will cause a parse error.
+Statements (definitions, assignments, ...) can also be quoted, but only inside a quoted statement list. Trying to quote a statement in the same way as an expression will cause a parse error.  Instead it is necessary to wrap the statements in a closure using ``{'' and ``}''.
 <code>
@@ Line 87: / Line 88: @@
 </code>
-If you actually want to quote a literal closure, you should use parantheses, since a literal closure is an expression.
 <note>
-`{ | foo | foo := 4 } gives a literal closure AG????
+Quoting a literal closure can be done in two ways: as an expression: <code>`({ |a, b| a + b})</code> or as a statement list: <code>`{ |a, b| a + b}</code>
+To quote a literal closure with the latter form, the vertical bars may not be ommited, even if the closure takes no arguments. <code>`{ || a + b }</code> yield a literal closure expression, while <code>`{ a + b}</code> yields a statement list.
 </note>
@@ Line 101: / Line 102: @@
 With this construct, all the elements of the literal table are evaluated. By quoting a literal table, all the elements are quoted instead of evaluated:
 <code>
->def tab := `[ 1+2, 3+4, 5+6 ]
+>def anotherTab := `[ 1+2, 3+4, 5+6 ]
 >>[1.+(2), 3.+(4), 5.+(6)]
 </code>
@@ Line 127: / Line 128: @@
 >[ 7, 8, 9, @upTo(4) ]
 >>[7, 8, 9, 1, 2, 3, 4]
+>[ 7, 8, 9, upTo(4) ]
+>>[7, 8, 9, [1, 2, 3, 4]]
 </code>
+In the example above the elements of the table returned by invoking **upTo(4)** are added in place to the table in which the expression was spliced.  Evaluating the same expression without the splice operator adds the table rather than the elements of the table.  Hence, the use of the splice operator removes a level of nesting and adds the elements //in place// to the table.
 Splicing can also be used in combination with quoting and unquoting. AmbientTalk provides the //unquote-splice// operator ''#@'' that can be used to splice the value of an unquotation into a quoted expression.
@@ Line 136: / Line 140: @@
 >>[@upTo(3), 1, 2, [1, 2, 3]]
 </code>
 ==== First-class abstract grammar ====
+Quoting an AmbientTalk expression results in an the parse tree of that expression. Like any value in AmbientTalk, parse trees are objects that respond to messages. This means that the abstract grammer of AmbientTalk is first-class: programs can manipulate and create asbtract grammar elements.
+<code>
+>`(f(1, 2, 3)).function
+>>f
+>`(f(1, 2, 3)).arguments
+>>[1, 2, 3]
+</code>
+Any abstract grammar element can serve as a prototype for a new one:
+<code>
+>def application := `(f(1, 2, 3))
+>>f(1, 2, 3)
+>application.new(`g, [4, 5, 6])
+>>g(4, 5, 6)
+</code>
+The following example uses meta-programming and reflection to generate a proxy for an object that provides a given interface. The interface's method list is examined and for each method specified in the interface, a method is generated that delegated to the actual object.
+<note>
+TODO: Update code
+</note>
+<code>
+def isMethodDefinition: statement { true };
+def policyOf: object with: interface {
+	def policyDefinition := interface.method.bodyExpression.statements;
+	policyDefinition.each: { | statement |
+		if: (isMethodDefinition: statement) then: {
+			def methodBody := statement.bodyExpression.statements;
+			if: ((methodBody.length == 1).and: { methodBody[1] == `nil }) then: {
+				def bodyExpression := `{ #(object) ^ #(statement.selector) ( #@(statement.arguments) ) };
+				statement.bodyExpression := bodyExpression;
+			}
+		}
+	};
+	object: interface;
+};
+</code>
+==== Read / Eval / Print ====
+AmbientTalk reifies the read, eval and print operations. This means that you can read any string and get the responding syntax tree for it, evaluate any syntax tree and get a value for it, and print any value and get a string representation of the value.
+<code>
+>read: "1+2"
+>>1.+(2)
+>def result := eval: `(1+2) in: self
+>>3
+>print: result
+>>"3"
+</code>
+Eval is a keyworded message that takes another parameter, namely the object in whose scope the expression must be evaluated.
+<code>
+>def o := object: { def x := 4 }
+>><obj:{super,super:=,x,x:=}>
+>eval: `x in: o
+>>4
+</code>
+==== Multi-stage (Generative) Programming ====
+Here's a small example of "compile-time" metaprogramming or "multi-stage programming" inspired by the same example from the E language on [[http://www.erights.org/elang/examples/multi-stage.html|Multi-stage programming in E]]:
+Below is a regular power function. Given two numbers 'x' and 'n', it returns 'x^n':
+<code javascript>
+def pow(x, n) {
+  if: (n == 0) then: {
+  } else: {
+    x * pow(x,n-1);
+  }
+};
+</code>
+Let's see whether it works:
+<code javascript>
+system.println(pow(2,5)); // prints 32
+</code>
+Now, consider the following 'expandPow' function that is very similar to the above function, but which, instead of //calculating the value// of the power function will //build an expression// that, when evaluated, yields the value of the power function. Note that this function is parameterized with the name of the variable that is used to calculate the power value:
+<code javascript>
+def expandPow(var, n) {
+  if: (n == 0) then: {
+    `1 // `exp returns an abstract syntax tree for exp
+  } else: {
+    // within a quoted expression, #(exp) evaluates exp,
+    // expects it to return an AST, and embeds that AST
+    // in the quoted expression
+    `(#var * #(expandPow(var, n-1)));
+  }
+};
+// this prints the expression 'y * y * y * 1'
+system.println("expandPow(`y,3) = " + expandPow(`y,3));
+</code>
+To be able to use the expression generated by the above function, let's define a small helper function that will embed this expression in a first-class function:
+<code javascript>
+def powMaker(n) {
+  def ast := expandPow(`x, n);
+  // the built-in function 'eval:in:' takes an expression and an object and
+  // evaluates the expression in the scope of the given object
+  // return a function that has the expanded expression as its body:
+  eval: `({|x| #ast}) in: self;
+};
+</code>
+Now we can generate power functions that are fixed in their second argument, but that are more efficient to execute:
+<code javascript>
+// pow5 is now bound to a function { |x| x*x*x*x*x*1 }
+def pow5 := powMaker(5);
+system.println(pow5(2)); // yields 32, as expected
+</code>
+You can measure the performance difference by timing the evaluation of both functions:
+<code javascript>
+import /.at.support.timer
+system.println("pow(2,5) takes " + (time: { pow(2,5) }) +"ms");
+system.println("pow5(2) takes " + (time: { pow5(2) }) +"ms");
+</code>
+The quoting and unquoting mechanism of AmbientTalk makes it really easy to "partially evaluate" a function in one of its arguments.
+The above example is available in the AmbientTalk library, under '/at/demo/metaprogramming.at'.