This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
research:context [2006/06/30 16:03] jorge |
research:context [2009/11/30 16:55] (current) dharnie *prog->soft |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Role-Based Ambient Communications | + | ===== Context-Dependent Behaviour Adaptations |
+ | [[http:// | ||
- | == Motivation: Context-Dependent Communications in Ambient Intelligence | + | ==== Motivation |
- | Within the domain of pervasive computing, context-awareness has commonly been defined as the ability of an application to adapt itself to its dynamic environment. The context of an application is defined as any information in the application' | + | Within the domain of pervasive computing, context-awareness has commonly been defined as the ability of an application to adapt itself to its dynamic environment. The context of an application is defined as any information |
- | In an interaction between two entities, however, the behaviour of the message receiver | + | Our observation is that in an interaction between two entities, the behaviour of the message receiver |
- | As said in the presentation of this website, we are working on the field of pervasive computing. In such a setting, context will play an important role. The context consists of all the information and services | + | We claim that in order to deal with context-dependent communications in mobile networks, we need a model that satisfies |
- | == Problem Statement == | + | * **Dynamic Context Adaptation**: |
- | So here is a summary | + | * **Dynamic Behaviour Composition**: |
- | * **Dynamic | + | * **Context |
- | * **Dynamic Behaviour Composition**: | + | ==== Design ==== |
- | * **Context Passing Mechanism**: It is not only the context | + | At our [[http:// |
+ | {{ rolemodel02.jpg? | ||
- | [[research: | + | The problem with the split objects model is that the message sender must know before hand which are the roles a receiver could take. In dynamic environments like mobile |
- | == Motivation | + | ==== Ongoing and Future Work ==== |
- | One may wonder why new referencing abstractions | + | These are the different research topics |
- | | + | * Composition |
+ | |||
+ | * Context-dependent adaptations | ||
- | | + | * Rule-based |
- | | + | * Combining actor and role models for the development |
- | == Design == | + | * Ad-hoc and intentional actor grouping. |
- | Ambient references unify two concepts: they are both a peer-to-peer discovery channel //and// an asynchronous communication channel to a remote object. | + | * Intra and Inter actor layers for context-dependent adaptations. |
- | == Ongoing and Future Work == | + | * Dynamic scope for context-dependent communications. |
- | - Composition of context-dependent application behaviours using prototype-based solutions (delegation hierarchies, | + | ==== Further Reading ==== |
- | - Context-dependent adaptations of behaviour using role-based models. | + | |
- | - Rule-based systems for context reasoning and role selection. | + | |
- | - Role-based communications. | + | |
- | - Combining actor and role models for the development of context-dependent applications. | + | |
- | - Ad-hoc and intentional actor grouping. | + | |
- | - Intra and Inter actor layers for context-dependent adaptations. | + | |
- | - Dynamic scope for context-dependent communications. | + | |
- | == Implementation == | + | **A Role-Based Implementation |
- | + | ||
- | A detailed explanation | + | |
- | + | ||
- | == Further Reading == | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Ambient References: Addressing | + |