research:dgc
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
research:dgc [2006/07/01 13:04] – elisag | research:dgc [2006/07/01 13:08] – elisag | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Semi-automatic garbage collection is a hybrid approach which relies on an underlying local GC and proposes a non-transparent DGC. The approach can be seen as an extension to the indirect reference counting (Piquer, | Semi-automatic garbage collection is a hybrid approach which relies on an underlying local GC and proposes a non-transparent DGC. The approach can be seen as an extension to the indirect reference counting (Piquer, | ||
- | {{ remoterefint.jpg?455x318| Click the image to enlarge }} | + | {{ remoterefint.jpg| Click the image to enlarge }} |
Since devices may not be able to communicate at some point in time, when a remote reference is first allocated both parties in the interaction will establish a contract with the condition under which the reference is useful to the application. Therefore, if one devices becomes inaccessible because of a broken connection, the other one is aware of the conditions in which the inaccessible reference is still valuable. We propose // | Since devices may not be able to communicate at some point in time, when a remote reference is first allocated both parties in the interaction will establish a contract with the condition under which the reference is useful to the application. Therefore, if one devices becomes inaccessible because of a broken connection, the other one is aware of the conditions in which the inaccessible reference is still valuable. We propose // |
research/dgc.txt · Last modified: 2015/02/04 19:10 by elisag