people
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
people [2009/12/02 11:50] – alombide | people [2010/07/27 11:26] – kpinte | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== People ===== | ===== People ===== | ||
- | The people behind the AmbientTalk project | + | These are the people behind the AmbientTalk project of the [[http://soft.vub.ac.be|Software Languages Lab]]. |
- | + | ||
- | {{ ambientpeople.jpg? | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //Part of the ambient group in June 2007. From left to right: Jorge Vallejos, Jessie Dedecker, Elisa Gonzalez Boix, Stijn Timbermont, Wolfgang De Meuter, Tom Van Cutsem.// | + | |
== Prof. Dr. Wolfgang De Meuter == | == Prof. Dr. Wolfgang De Meuter == | ||
- | [[ http://prog.vub.ac.be/doku.php? | + | [[ http://soft.vub.ac.be/soft/wolfwiki/ |
In the past, I have been active in the design and formalisation of prototype-based object-oriented programming languages. After a small detour in AOP (where I introduced monads in AOP and identified the need for cflow with jumping aspects), I'm currently working with the ambient group on the design and implementation of ambient-oriented programming languages. My current mission is to come up with language constructs that make writing software for loosely coupled (mobile) distributed systems as much fun as writing sequential programs in languages like Scheme, Smalltalk or Haskell. This is done by inventing new programming language abstractions and by hiding the technical burden as much as possible in the interpreter of those languages. | In the past, I have been active in the design and formalisation of prototype-based object-oriented programming languages. After a small detour in AOP (where I introduced monads in AOP and identified the need for cflow with jumping aspects), I'm currently working with the ambient group on the design and implementation of ambient-oriented programming languages. My current mission is to come up with language constructs that make writing software for loosely coupled (mobile) distributed systems as much fun as writing sequential programs in languages like Scheme, Smalltalk or Haskell. This is done by inventing new programming language abstractions and by hiding the technical burden as much as possible in the interpreter of those languages. | ||
Line 36: | Line 32: | ||
I am currently looking into programming abstractions that allow to specify which events to capture by distributed application components in a mobile ad hoc network. Furthermore, | I am currently looking into programming abstractions that allow to specify which events to capture by distributed application components in a mobile ad hoc network. Furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== | ||
+ | == Kevin Pinte == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our everyday environment will soon be pervaded with RFID tags, tiny chips that can be integrated into any physical object. The tags can store and disperse information about the object or its environment. RFID technology is a key technology in developing pervasive context-aware applications. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am investigating new programming abstractions to develop //mobile RFID-enabled applications// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Currently programming such applications is problematic. Communicating with RFID tags is prone to many failures as the connections with tags are extremely volatile and RFID tags have a small range of operation. State-of-the-art RFID applications heavily rely on infrastructure and merely employ RFID tags as digital barcodes, not exploiting the writable memory on the tags. As a consequence mobile RFID-enabled applications have to be developed in an ad hoc way, building upon low-level hardware abstractions leaving the developer to deal with RFID hardware characteristics manually. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== | ||
+ | == Dries Harnie == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks to the work of the other people on this page, programming applications for mobile devices is now as easy as, say, writing a blog. However, research so far has focused on one-to-one communication and how the properties of MANETs disrupt it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the Real World(tm) we do group communication without giving it a second thought, changing conversation topics as people leave and rejoin the group. Likewise, we effortlessly do service composition: | ||
+ | |||
+ | My research intends to provide abstractions that bind a number of services residing on different mobile devices into coherent entities. Programmers can then use these abstractions to communicate with groups of services as easily as with single services. | ||
===== | ===== |
people.txt · Last modified: 2018/04/12 22:07 by elisag