people
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
people [2009/12/02 11:50] – alombide | people [2010/07/31 15:38] – * stijnm | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== People ===== | ===== People ===== | ||
- | The people behind the AmbientTalk project | + | These are the people behind the AmbientTalk project of the [[http://soft.vub.ac.be|Software Languages Lab]]. |
- | + | ||
- | {{ ambientpeople.jpg? | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //Part of the ambient group in June 2007. From left to right: Jorge Vallejos, Jessie Dedecker, Elisa Gonzalez Boix, Stijn Timbermont, Wolfgang De Meuter, Tom Van Cutsem.// | + | |
== Prof. Dr. Wolfgang De Meuter == | == Prof. Dr. Wolfgang De Meuter == | ||
- | [[ http://prog.vub.ac.be/doku.php? | + | [[ http://soft.vub.ac.be/soft/wolfwiki/ |
In the past, I have been active in the design and formalisation of prototype-based object-oriented programming languages. After a small detour in AOP (where I introduced monads in AOP and identified the need for cflow with jumping aspects), I'm currently working with the ambient group on the design and implementation of ambient-oriented programming languages. My current mission is to come up with language constructs that make writing software for loosely coupled (mobile) distributed systems as much fun as writing sequential programs in languages like Scheme, Smalltalk or Haskell. This is done by inventing new programming language abstractions and by hiding the technical burden as much as possible in the interpreter of those languages. | In the past, I have been active in the design and formalisation of prototype-based object-oriented programming languages. After a small detour in AOP (where I introduced monads in AOP and identified the need for cflow with jumping aspects), I'm currently working with the ambient group on the design and implementation of ambient-oriented programming languages. My current mission is to come up with language constructs that make writing software for loosely coupled (mobile) distributed systems as much fun as writing sequential programs in languages like Scheme, Smalltalk or Haskell. This is done by inventing new programming language abstractions and by hiding the technical burden as much as possible in the interpreter of those languages. | ||
Line 36: | Line 32: | ||
I am currently looking into programming abstractions that allow to specify which events to capture by distributed application components in a mobile ad hoc network. Furthermore, | I am currently looking into programming abstractions that allow to specify which events to capture by distributed application components in a mobile ad hoc network. Furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== | ||
+ | == Kevin Pinte == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our everyday environment will soon be pervaded with RFID tags, tiny chips that can be integrated into any physical object. The tags can store and distribute information about the object or its environment. RFID technology is a key technology in developing pervasive context-aware applications. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I am investigating new programming abstractions to develop //mobile RFID-enabled applications// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Currently programming such applications is problematic. Communicating with RFID tags is prone to many failures as the connections with tags are extremely volatile and RFID tags have a small range of operation. State-of-the-art RFID applications heavily rely on infrastructure and merely employ RFID tags as digital barcodes, not exploiting the writable memory on the tags. As a consequence mobile RFID-enabled applications have to be developed in an ad hoc way, building upon low-level hardware abstractions leaving the developer to deal with RFID hardware characteristics manually. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You can find more information about my work [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== | ||
+ | == Dries Harnie == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks to the work of the other people on this page, programming applications for mobile devices is now as easy as, say, writing a blog. However, research so far has focused on one-to-one communication and how the properties of MANETs disrupt it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the Real World(tm) we do group communication without giving it a second thought, changing conversation topics as people leave and rejoin the group. Likewise, we effortlessly do service composition: | ||
+ | |||
+ | My research intends to provide abstractions that bind a number of services residing on different mobile devices into coherent entities. Programmers can then use these abstractions to communicate with groups of services as easily as with single services. | ||
===== | ===== | ||
== Stijn Mostinckx == | == Stijn Mostinckx == | ||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | The goal of my research is the development | + | In the past, I have contributed to the formulation |
+ | |||
+ | A first element of the solution I propose is the use of pattern matching rules to succinctly describe which changes | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second element of the proposed solution is the use of [[research: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The approach that combines and integrates these elements is the [[research: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== | ||
+ | == Eline Philips == | ||
+ | Nomadic networks fill the gap between fixed networks and mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) as they consist of a group of mobile devices that can move around dynamically while trying to maintain a connection with a fixed infrastructure. My research focusses on the coordination of nomadic services by making use of workflows as they provide an additional layer of abstraction such that interactions among application components can be specified on a higher level and be reused because of their loose coupling with the fine-grained application logic. Unfortunately, | ||
+ | volatility. | ||
+ | |||
+ | AmbientTalk is a programming language which treats disconnections at the very heart of its computational model. Moreover, the language supports dynamic service discovery which is opportune for nomadic networks. Although this language is suited for writing applications for MANETs, the orchestration of these applications is still programmed in an ad hoc manner. Complex nomadic applications that consist of asynchronously executing distributed services become hard to develop, understand and reuse. I am currently working on the addition of an abstraction layer on top of AmbientTalk which implements | ||
+ | workflow patterns. I am investigating which new patterns for nomadic networks can be added to this abstraction layer. Concretely, I want support for intensional descriptions of services, group communication, | ||
- | My ongoing research investigates which abstractions can be used to handle the events produced by an implementation of the fact space model. An interesting path that I am currently exploring is the use of [[research: | ||
===== | ===== |
people.txt · Last modified: 2018/04/12 22:07 by elisag