Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- start [2007/07/28 17:26] – added tvcutsem
+++ start [2007/07/30 20:52] – added tvcutsem
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
   * It abandons the RPC abstraction in favor of //asynchronous, non-blocking// message passing. Because the system automatically buffers such messages while the receiver of the message is disconnected, the programmer can abstract over temporary network failures //by default//!
   * It has built-in programming language constructs for objects to //discover// one another in the local ad hoc network. Peer-to-peer //service discovery// is built into the language.
-  * It features a dynamic OO kernel language built upon the principles of prototype-based programmer. More importantly, the kernel language is reflective and hence extensible from within the language itself.
+  * It features a dynamic OO kernel language built upon the principles of prototype-based programming. More importantly, the kernel language is reflective and hence extensible from within the language itself.
 Check out the [[at:introduction|introduction]] to AmbientTalk for a hands-on example showing you the benefits in actual code.
+AmbientTalk is not our only research artifact. There is also [[crime:introduction|CRIME]], a data-driven programming language which explores the logic programming paradigm to tackle similar coordination issues in mobile ad hoc networks.
 ===== Contact =====