Consistent with a transition from "in vitro'' to "in vivo'' research (cf. Work Packages) we need to carefully analyse the current state-of-the-praxis and compare that against the state-of-the-art. In particular, we need to compare the features offered by the numerous continuous integration tools to see how we can optimally integrate our techniques. We will also closely monitor the relevant features of major IDEs to see how to best plug in our research prototypes.

In addition, we need to study the situations within the different members of the industrial steering board to identify commonalities and variances between the tools and processes used within each organisation. Therefore, we will set up site visits with the various partners using an open-ended questionnaire to allow for an in-depth analysis of the context for this research project.

Activities and their deliverables

All deliverables are available to members of the industrial steering board. Please log in.

Activity 1.1: Site visits with members of the industrial steering board.

• Deliverable 1.1.a State of the praxis within the partner organisations (Release 1)
• Deliverable 1.1.b State of the praxis within the partner organisations (Release 2)

Activity 1.2: Comparison of continuous integration tools as well as major IDEs.

• Deliverable 1.2.a Comparative study of continuous integration tools as well as major IDEs (Release 1)
• Deliverable 1.2.b Comparative study of continuous integration tools (Release 2)